Muslims of India are converts from Hindus

This study titled “A shared Y-chromosomal heritage between Muslims and Hindus in India” was published in November 2006 in the journal of ‘Human Genetics’. The study carried out at the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. If you click on the title, it will take you to the abstract of this research paper.

Basically, this study reinforces the long-held belief that Muslims in Indian sub-continent (present India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) are not the descendants of central asian Muslim invaders. We all know that Islam came to India centuries back through the Islamic invaders (like Babur- his original name being Zāhir ud-Dīn Mohammad- or more broadly called Mughal emperors). They came to the Hindu Indian sub-continent and gradually Islam spread: largely through forceful conversions ( Aurangzeb is the best known example in this regard) and to some extent by the voluntary conversion through the teachings of sufis. Also it is said that the majority of Hindus who converted were poor or so-called lower caste Hindus (this examlifies that caste system has been a bane for the Hindu society and has done so much damage to Hindus. Obviously!).

Thus the Muslims of Indian sub-continent are converted Hindus. Majority of them!
How religion can play havoc with the soul of a nation: India is a very apt example. How ironic that a nation was divided on the basis of religion! And more ironic is the fact that the two communities are the sons of the same mother. But now they fight in the name of religion. Fight for a religion which was always ALIEN to this country. How rueful ! The two brothers share the same blood, but fight because one eats beef, and for other cow is sacred! One considers that the nation is like a mother (Bharat maata), but other is willing to die rather than bow (vande maatram controversy)! For an “implanted” religion! They eat same,dress same, speak almost the same language(Urdu is an offshoot from Hindi), share many cultural values, but when rabble rousers arouse their passions, they will kill each other!

And the worse, the terrorism- more precisely Islamic terrorism- has done so much harm to this nation. On a global level, it will seem that only USA (they have immortalized 9/11 because they as a nation donot want to forget it and want to avenge the attack!) or Britain or some more countries have actually been a victim of Islamic terrorism, but India (Kashmir) has been bleeding since 1947! Similarly, christian conversions are in full force in North-East India and many other parts. Will USA come to our rescue? No. First we (India) have to stand up and face the terrorism and then others will come and pitch in.

Hindus typically donot believe in conversions/proselytization and I have never seen concerted efforts in this regard. Is it a bad idea that the Hindu saints make appeals and efforts to bring back (Shuddhi)those estranged brothers who had converted to the other faiths? This of course must be peaceful and entirely voluntary!
When I was growing up in India, I remember we Indians have a craze for the westernized names and many of christian names sound very ‘musical’to their ears (they are, actually. No denying.) But after spending many years abroad (USA), I witness that Indian christians-even though living in nations with predominantly Christian populations- have their own churches! What to talk of these recent immigrants (as my Indian christains are), churches for blacks and whites are also separate. This is the level of acceptance! Thus it pains me that some of Indians look Indians, eat Indian foods, come to Indian stores for groceries, donot go to ‘their’ churches (even though share the common faith) but when it comes to names, have names that sound not Indian, rather sound totally alien! Why an Indian who was born in a village or city in India, grew up studying and speaking Hindi or a equally sweat regional language (along with English), swears by Indian customs, ethos and cannot live without ‘desi’ food, speaks English with a typical Indian accent and yet has a name like David, Johnson, Robert, Anney, Marria, Aurangzeb, Asif or Qutub! How alien it sounds! Someone will ask me : what is in a name? Very true, but your name does show your ethnicity,identity and cultural back-ground and values! Do we expect a boy living in a city somewhere in Peru (Latin America) having a name like Suresh or Bhaskar or Anil! No, we donot! And it will be weired, if we do come across! Does not it seem strange that a person living in India should carry an Arabic, Persian or Turkish name ( no offence intended, these are beautiful languages) because he is a muslim! Are these names relevant to an Indian- who has all his life lived in India, and never even ventured out of his city and carries the burden of ‘alien’ names like Khan ( a lineal descendant of Genkhis Khan), Zia( light), Hussain (name of a saint), Allam ( very knowledgeable), Manssor (victorious), Azmal (holy), Shakeel (beautiful), Anjum (star), Afroza , Ruksana. Similarly names like David, Phillips, Paul, Michael, Elizabeth, Nicolas, Peter, Sussan, Alexandra have some connotations to the Bible or the places but as far as Indian land is concerned, they are totally ‘foreign’, ‘alien’ and strange -looking names. That day, I met a person from Turkey whose 4 years daughter’s name was ‘Noorjahan”. Very apt and relevant name , I thought! But what the heck, why we Indians have been carrying the burden of such words since ages whom we donot even understand ! Agreed, India has been a land of assimilation, religious tolerance but whom are we aping? And why in the name of maintaining a separate identity, Muslims of my country -who are Indians in every respect- are carrying these alien language names!

Dear brothers and sisters! Dear countrymen!Come out of this paradox! Shun what was never yours! We are not the descendants of Babur and Aurangzeb! Come back and embrace your true roots of the oldest civilization -which belongs to you and you belong to it! And the one which spreads universal peace and brotherhood. Come back and letus bring back our glorious heritage: one based upon the universal concepts of peace, brotherhood and compassion. Come back to your original faith and be an Indian with a global vision (Vasudhaive Kutumbakam)and for world peace ( Vishwa Shanti).
This will be the first step to get back your identity!

I donot envisage a Hindu nation, beacuse I am of the resolute opinion that fathers of our Constitution showed greater vision in declaring India a ‘Secular’ state. And India has always been a secular nation. But regaining of our lost faith should be seen as a consolidation of our strength! And this will go a long way in furthering the cause of a truly secular society based upon uniform civil codes for all the citizens.

Is China Collapsing?

Everyone is talking about China these days. It is the rising star and western media is devoting countless time and energy in analyzing how and why China is going to be the number one economy in the years to come.
Here is another point of view. Infact, the author Gordon Chang ( http://www.gordonchang.com/) had predicted in his book ‘The Coming Collapse of China’ in 2003 that China will not be able to sustain this tempo.
The author is a Chinese American lawyer who has lived and worked in China and Hong Kong for over 20 years, bringing first-hand experience and economic expertise to this book.

Think Tanks

Washington, DC -based “The Heritage Foundation” strives to build an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity and civil society flourish. Its mission statement reads: “Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institute – a think tank – whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.”
The Foundation claims it has influenced many policies and decisions in American history and polity and continues to do so. As it says: “We believe that ideas have consequences, but that those ideas must be promoted aggressively. So, we constantly try innovative ways to market our ideas.”
To read more about the foundation and its activities, logon to:http://www.heritage.org/

So we are talking of think tanks. Wikipedia says: “Since “think tank” is a term that has only found use since the 1950s, there is still some debate over what constitutes the first think tank. One candidate is the Fabian Society of Britain, founded in 1884 to promote gradual social change. The Brookings Institution, founded in the US in 1916 is another candidate for the first think tank. The term think tank itself, however, was originally used in reference to organizations that offered military advice, most notably the RAND Corporation, formed originally in 1945.
Until around 1970, there were no more than several dozen think tanks, mostly focused on offering non-partisan policy and military advice to the United States government, and generally with large staffs and research budgets. After 1970, the number of think tanks exploded, as many smaller new think tanks were formed to express various partisan, political, and ideological views.”

A NRI asks Railways to improve!

A USA based NRI- Dr Themplangad- has filed a writ petition against Indians Railways to improve practices of human excreta disposal as the current practices of disposing excreta in the open is not healthy and environmental friendly. Good job! We actually need many more such actions to improve civic amenities back home. Here is the link to this article published online on rediff.com on Januuary 28, 2007.
http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/jan/28rail.htm

Politically Incorrect


Atanu Dey (http://www.deeshaa.org/) has written this beautiful critique on Indian voters. Whereas we Indians typically like to bask in the glory of our past, this is a slightly different prespective. He makes a valid point, though I think the helplessness of Indian voter is partly due to the lack of reforms in our electoral process.

I am never quite sure why people insist that the Indian democracy is so great. To me it appears to be the greatest curse imposed on India from up on high. It is totally politically (sic) incorrect to take this view, of course. But I don’t apologize for believing so and I am convinced that the Indian voter is corrupt.
Rajesh Jain’s blog has an
item on lessons from India’s elections which got me thinking. The claim made by Shekhar Gupta of the Indian Express is that India’s voter has become smart.
Compared to whom? I ask. Compared to Shekhar Gupta?
I guess so since Shekhar Gupta claims that the Indian voter has become smart. For I don’t see any reason to believe that the Indian voter has changed in any substantial way. The Indian voter continues to be a narrow-minded, ignorant, casteist, bigoted, vacuous idiot it has always been.
Here is my reasoning.
Exhibit A: I look at the politicians of this country. To a first approximation, they are ignorant, bigoted, casteist, vacuous idiotic criminals. These bunch of unspeakable criminals (where I use the word in its literal sense) are consistently voted into power by the Indian voter.
Fact B: A population of wise, informed, well-meaning, broad-minded, intelligent voters cannot continue to vote a bunch of corrupt ignorant bigots as their political leaders.
Major Premise C: Voters reveal their character by expressing their preferences at the polls.
Minor Premise D: Leaders are endogenous to the group, that is, they emerge from within the group and so reflect the dominant traits of the group. Mr Gupta writes that the voter is not swayed by charisma. Well, how would we know? We need charismatic people first and then if the voter is unmoved, we can say that it is true.
We do know that the Indian voter is swayed by “big names”, though. Why else would they trot out an uneducated chap (Rahul Gandhi) as the Congress mascot unless they were confident that the Indian voter will be swayed?
What else explains the tenacity with which the entire Nehru-Gandhi clan is totally into getting into the highest political positions? By their indomitable courage? No. Their astonishing brilliance in academics? None are really even educated. Their thorough understanding of the problems of development? Never done an honest day’s work. Their undying dedication to the hard task of nation building? Shirley, you jest. Their selfless sacrifice demonstrated by their social work? Not a bloody chance in hell.
What then explains the astonishing idiocy of the Indian voter to continue to vote the Nehru-Gandhi clan to power?
Let’s face the facts. I would have loved to report that we are a great democracy. We are not. If we were, we would not be facing the prospect of having an Italian aupair as the prime minister of a country of 1000 000 000 people. She says that she is loyal to her adopted country (never mind that she did not apply for Indian citizen for over a decade). Well, I would ask her whether she has any loyalty to the country that she was born in. No? If a person has no loyalty towards the land of one’s birth, I would not pay a tinker’s damn to any other oath of loyalty that the person takes. If you change your allegiance once, it is all too easy to do it once again. Indians who don’t understand that simple concept are idiots and I don’t care how accomplished they may be in their respective fields. If an Indian says that Sonia’s origin is not an issue for the prime minister’s seat, I would say that Indian is a moron.
I have met only a handful of politicians personally. I have known some of them well and all of them—every one of them to the last person—has accumulated vast sums of money through bribery and corruption. It is a random sample. I have no doubt that the vast majority of Indian politicians are corrupt. Politicians are endogenous to the population. They are random samples drawn from the underlying population. In other words, the sample characteristics give an indication of the population characteristics. The corruption of the politicians is the single most damning evidence that the voters are corrupt.
That is the law.

Pariah

Januray 27,2007:DAVOS, Switzerland — Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry slammed the foreign policy of the Bush administration on Saturday, saying it has caused the United States to become “a sort of international pariah.”

What is a pariah? Mariam Webster dictionary gives us the following account: Etymology: Tamil ‘paraiyan’, literally, drummer
1 : a member of a low caste 2 : one that is despised or rejected : outcast
Notably, this word Pariah is often used in Hindi language also.

Guru Granth Sahib: Fifth Ved

Teaching universal brotherhood

Guru Granth Sahib is the fifth Ved brought to light by Guru Nanak Dev. One must read the story Sach Khand, Janam Sakhi Guru Nanak Dev Jee for a comprehensive understanding of the subject.
Guru Arjan Dev, the fifth Guru incarnate of Guru Nanak Dev, compiled Bani. Initially called pothi, it was kept in Harmandar Sahib. Baba Budha Jee was the first granthi who used to recite Bani. Thus, pothi was called Adhi Granth and, then, Guru Granth Sahib by the tenth Guru Gobind Singh. This should be worshipped by all with reverence at it teaches universal brotherhood.
The SGPC should lay special focus on popularising the life history of Guru Nanak Dev. The life history should be published in all languages and given wide publicity. The present practice of giving a saropa and a piece of cloth to people should be substituted with a copy of Janam Sakhi, wrapped in cloth as a mark of respect.

Lt-Col P.S. SARANG (retd), Chandigarh

Published in The Tribune (January 24, 2007)

Where do we stand

Where do we stand in the contemporary world !

In year 2006: India ranks very low at 126 in HDI (Human Development Index) as released by the UNO.
Poverty Index is another way of looking at the things and surely we have no respectable scoring here too as we have lop-sided development in our stride so far.

Wikipedia provides the following info about these indices:

1] The Human Poverty Index is an indication of the standard of living in a country, developed by the United Nations (UN). The UN considers this a better indicator than the Human Development Index, which in turn is considered a better indicator than the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

2] The Human Development Index (HDI) is a comparative measure of life expectancy, literacy, education, and standard of living for countries worldwide. It is a standard means of measuring well-being, especially child welfare. It is used to determine and indicate whether a country is a developed, developing, or underdeveloped country and also to measure the impact of economic policies on quality of life.[1] The index was developed in 1990 by Pakistani economist Mahbub ul Haq and has been used since 1993 by the United Nations Development Programme in its annual Human Development Report.

Illegal immigrants

I thought issues are politicized only in India, not in USA! The way the issue of il-legal immigrants is being handled with a vote in mind just reflects that vote bank politics can lure anyone!

The people and groups who are advocating to be soft towards il-legal immigrants and that a humane approach be taken towards them often say that these il-legal immigrants are doing the jobs that no one else will do and that they are contributing so much to the economy of USA. But that is not the issue. You cannot compare burglars with home-guests! And americans (or legal immigrants for that matter) will take up the jobs when there is no one else to do them. Why not! When there are no one to do a particular job, will not it be offered at a higher wages and will it not attract workers! I mean free market will balance the things.

The way the federal government is acting as a rolly-polly umpire towards il-legal immigrants, that is a certainly disheartening to right-thinking people who want to abide by rules to attain a respectful immigrant status in this country! The way an illegal mother (of a child who was born here in USA and thus became citizen) has taken shelter in a church in chicago and has ‘refused’ to leave and certain groups of people are supporting her for ethnic interests just reflects politics of populism and nothing else.