Chamcha- Giri


The trait of chamcha-giri (flattery) is well-established in our politicians. Here is a letter expressing the same sentiments.

Cringing flattery

I was surprised to see the photograph (Feb 8) showing Punjab Finance Minister and Congress candidate from Amritsar, Surinder Singla, making fawning obeisance to the AICC president, Sonia Gandhi. Apparently, Sonia Gandhi did not bother to acknowledge Singla’s gesture reverential gesture and looked towards another side.
Many Congress leaders used to bow before Indira Gandhi like slaves. Former Congress president Dev Kanth Barooah earned the sobriquet of her Durbari Maskhara (court jester) by his ludicrous remarks “Indira is India”.
At a rally in Jind, Haryana Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda described Sonia Gandhi as “a holy stream of the Ganga in the polluted politics”. Once the late BJP leader Pramod Mahajan compared Atal Bihari Vajpayee with Jesus Christ as both shared the same date of birth – December 25.

BHAGWAN SINGH, Qadian
(Source: The Tribune, Feb 27,07)

Gandhi: Father of Pakistan?


This letter was published in The Pioneer (link) onFeb 25, 2007.

This refers to the article, “Did Jinnah really fight for freedom?” (February 18), by Samuel Baid. The writer needs to be appreciated for disclosing the fact that Pakistan’s largest Islamic party, Jamiat-ul-Ulema Islam, has decided to expunge Mohammed Ali Jinnah’s name from the list of Pakistan’s freedom fighters. The reason given is that neither did Jinnah do anything for Islam, nor had he gone to jail during the freedom struggle.
The JUI is the Pakistani version of India’s Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Hind (JUH), which was founded by Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, a close associate of Mahatma Gandhi since 1919. The JUH had opposed India’s Partition till the end, hoping it could re-establish Muslim rule throughout undivided India with the support of Hindu leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru. Jinnah’s partition plan, however, shattered such hopes.
The choice of the JUI for the next person to be named “Father of Pakistan” would, therefore, logically fall on Maulana Azad and Mahatma Gandhi, the torchbearers of the Khilafat movement in 1920 and subsequent struggle against the British. It was Mahatma Gandhi who brushed aside the burning questions of the time, such as the massacre at the Jallianwala Bagh and the Rowlatt Act, and made Khilafat an important movement. Gandhi’s authoritative biographer, DG Tendulkar, says: “Around Gandhi new forces were gathering. The ulema felt that the Muslim divines of India whose collective power and influence had been shattered after the revolt of 1857 should again come together…” (Mahatma, Vol-I).
On March 10, 1920, Gandhi observed: “The Khilafat has now become the question of questions…” On March 19, explaining the four parts of the Khilafat movement, he said that while its three parts were to be followed by all Hindus, Muslims and others, the fourth was mainly for Muslims. He observed: “But Muslims have special Quranic obligations in which Hindus may or may not join. They, therefore, reserve to themselves the right, in the event of the failure of non-cooperation-cum-non-violence, in order to enforce justice, to resort to all such methods as may be enjoined by the Islamic scriptures. I venture heartily to associate myself with this resolution…”.
This is a sample of Gandhi’s double-faced non-violence — one for Hindus and another for Muslims.

Ram Gopal
New Delhi

MPLAD: Scrap it

Recently the issue of MPLAD (MPs and MLAs Local Area Development Scheme) has been in news again.This scheme was initailly started by the then Prime Minister Mr PV Narsimha Rao and each MP was sanctioned one crore rupees annually to spend on the development of his/her area. This lucrative scheme -with no accountability- was liked by all MPs and if I am correct, the current tag is 2 crore rupees annually. This is a huge money, particularly when you multiply this by 5 and that this money is largely unaccountable. One reader in The Tribune- while appealing for scrappimg this fund- has raised a very valid point that the scheme also circumvents the spirit of the panchayati raj institutions (PRIs). The letter is reproduced below.

The editorial “Scrap MPLADS” (Feb 19) rightly suggests Parliament to wind up the MPs’ Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) as recommended by the Administrative Reforms Commission headed by Mr M. Veerappa Moily in its latest report, Ethics in Governance. This scheme has remained mired in controversy since its inception and the malaise has spread to municipal corporations across the country, involving a whopping Rs 15,000 crore.
Several other committees had also called for the abolition of the scheme. One cannot lose sight of the corrupt practices in this scheme in a string operation. The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has also upheld Parliament’s right to disqualify members who were caught accepting bribes in the sting operation.
Unspent money under this scheme by MPs and MLAs and favouritism in sanctioning the funds are the other maladies. Examples galore, some MPs have diverted the entire fund meant for eight or nine Assembly segments to just one or two for political mileage.
The scheme also circumvents the spirit of the panchayati raj institutions (PRIs). To make use of the taxpayers’ money judiciously, the scheme needs to be scrapped. Let the crores of rupees allocated under this scheme be saved and utilised for actual development.

S.K. KHOSLA, Chandigarh

Change My City’s name: Faridabad to Fule Nagar or any other


What is in a name? A lot! It tells you about your heritage and your past. Unfortunately, in my case, it is a burden which I have been carrying for years and many people of my town will agree with me. I belong to a town which is well known in India. I am from a town called Faridabad, about 16 miles (25 KM) from the Capital of India, New Delhi. It comes under Haryana state and is the industrial hub of Haryana with a polpulation of 1.5 million. It is home to people from all over the nation. The tragedy is that its name is neither symbolic of its cultural heritage ,nor of its aspirations. As the history shows, the name was given to us by one of the administrator of the Mohguls who invaded our country and ruled over it.

The official web-site of Faridabad administration (here is the link) tells us about the origin of the name:
“Faridabad was founded in A.D. 1607 by Shaikh Farid, treasurer of Jahangir, with the object of protecting the highway which passed through the town. Shaikh Farid built a fort, a tank and a mosque which are in runins. Later, it becomes the headquaters of a pargana which was held in jagir by the Ballabgarh ruler. Faridabad became 12th District of Haryana State on 15th August, 1979. Faridabad is about 25 Kilometers from Delhi…”

They have since gone, but the name persists! Majority of people from Faridabad may actually not be even aware of the origin of this name! But the name carries on!

I urge upon the people of Faridabad, its elected representatives to consider changing this name to a more of Indian name so that the ghost of Moghul rule does not persist with us! I want to get rid of a name which reflects of a ruler or history which was a dark period for us. Why not give a name which symbolizes our own culture, for example: Mahtama Fule nagar, Shivaji Nagar (who fought Moghuls), Vivekanand Nagar, or just any other name!

In the next assembly elections, there should be a referendum and thus voters of faridabad can decide about this issue. This is a pretty democratic way of dealing with this issue.

Electoral Reforms

The news item (click on the title of this write-up to see that) is indeed heartening: Law Ministry is pushing for poll reforms. The world’s largest democracy – as India is – needs more teeth so as to be optimally effective. The vital player of the democracy – the voter- is left high and dry because the politicians of today have exploited the situation and either you vote or not, they are going to rule over you! What we need today most are:

1.Criminals should not be able to gain entry into electoral politics. Thus the move to debar charge-sheeted persons to contest is a welcome move.
2.The prrovision for ‘negative voting’ so that a ‘bad’ person could be precluded from getting elected.
3.Vote to ‘recall’.
4.Anti-defection law should be made much more stringent.
5.Post-poll alliances should be governed by certain rules. Similarly there could be many more reforms to sharpen our electoral system.
Wheras electoral reforms are the need of the hour, here is a write-up by noted commentator Khushwant Singh. He has aptly described the ground realities- taking Punjab as an example – as far as our democracy is concerned. And his summation of the facts is real and this is what is happening actually. As it reads:

All in the name of elections
by KHUSHWANT SINGH

IN a few days three states will go to the polls. Of the three, the outcome of one which may indicate what the people think about the performance of the Sonia Gandhi-Manmohan Singh Government in the Centre will be Punjab.

It is a border state which reacts sharply to changes in India-Pakistan equations. It has seen three wars fought in its territory. It has India’s third largest religious minority, the Sikhs, in majority. The outcome will indicate whether or not the Central Government policies are, or are not, even-handed in its treatment of other minorities, the Muslims and Christians.


Punjab remains the most go-ahead and the richest agricultural state of the Union. The results will indicate whether or not its farmers are, or are not, satisfied with what the state government is doing for them. Other issues like the future of Chandigarh and distribution of river waters will be shelved for the time being. The demand for Khalistan is dead. So is militant activity perpetrated in its name. Relations with Pakistan have never been better. The Sikhs have never had it so good as they have today. Credit for these achievements go to the Congress.
The main contenders for power are the same: on the one side the Congress is led by Captain Amarinder Singh, erstwhile Maharaja of Patiala, on the other the Akali-BJP combine is led by Parkash Singh Badal, head of Punjab’s wealthiest family owning vast tracts of farm lands and real estate.

Amarinder Singh has the state’s resources behind him. Badal controls the mini empire of Sikh temples managed by the SGPC and thousands of schools, colleges and hospitals run by it.
From what one can gauge from full-page advertisements in Punjab papers launched by both adversaries, money will be no problem for either party: it will flow like the waters of the Sutlej and the Beas. So will desi sharaab. Punjab retains its position as the number one state in the consumption of liquor and drugs.

So far only the names of candidates have been announced. They follow the old feudal pattern: sons, sons-in-law, nephews and other relations come first, next come caste affiliations: Jats, Khatris, Mazhabis (Dalit) for reserved seats. In larger cities like Ludhiana, Amritsar and Jalandhar, they are from the rich creamy layer. Elections need money; they have it.
Starry-eyed youngsters who dream of modernising India by ridding it of its pseudo-religious clap-trap do not appear in the lists of aspirants. For them no matter who wins or loses, it will be as the French put it: plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose (the more it changes, the more it remains the same thing).

Maranatha: conversions galore in India

I regularly recieve “The Volunteer” magazine published by Maranatha Volunteers International (http://www.maranatha.org/)- a US based Christian missionary organization. My physician friend -George Matthews from Chicago- originally from Kerala- brought my attention to this organization saying that it is a financially sound organization with quite a vigor (His prayers go to Lord Jesus,but understands the contours of this conversion business well). It is very clear that Maranatha works tirelessly to build more and more churches across the world ( ‘1000 churches in 1000 days’ is its one of very appealing project), and India is its special destination. Why not, we have billions of people living in India and still 85 % people are Hindus: so there is immense scope and potential to proselytize! And then there are underlying factors which can make their task easy: abject poverty (have you ever seen a rich Gupta or Gaikwad or Aiyngaar or Arora sahib embracing Christianity!!), rampant illiteracy, ignorance and notwithstanding the “TLC (Tender Love and Care) policy of christian missionaries. I must applaud the organized, meticulous and long-term approach of Christain evangelists: they have done wonders in converting many parts of the globe where ever they went: Africa to Latin America.

So what Indian counterparts – Hindu organizations- are doing in this regard? I donot subscribe to the theory of countering them by violence (this does not pay dividens in long-term). And then my Hindu brothers will say: “Oh, we donot believe in conversions!” Well said and point taken! But letus focus on these things:
1] Create an awareness that the ultimate design of the Christian nuns and workers is to ‘snatch away’ your faith: Lord Jesus will repalce your Ram
2] Help our tribals and poor people come out of shackles of poverty and illiteracy: with human participation and of course money. We donot necessarily have to go to these areas but we can be a part of many organizations who are working in these directions. If there is one Maranatha (Mara-natha), we need to build one ‘Rama-natha ‘ to counter them in a peaceful manner: if memebers of maranatha organization can go from, say ,USA to India to serve in poor areas , why not Indians living in USA do the same!
3] Hindu saints should venture upon the mission of “Shudhi” (purification) whereby efforts should be made to re-convert these Christians to Hindus (Ghar Vaapsi = Home coming).
4] Last but not the least, we must publicly denounce the evil practices of Hinduism, like catse-based division and consciously make efforts to eliminate that. Because our dalit brothers are their prime target!

Maranatha is just an example (or even a tip of iceberg?), we must fully understand the long-term designs of these organizations and must secure our house also. Let them do what they get pleasure in doing (though they may be termed nefarious activities by many!),but keep your house intact and they will tire out! I am sure the broad-based tenets of Hinduism are strong enough to withstand these ‘winds’ but we need to be conscious of this. It is deplorable that these evangelist-zealots are actually maligning their own religion by these acts. I wish they could understand the real meaning of such a beautiful religion whom we know as Christianity.

Blame Game

The latest (February 19,2007) bomb blasts on the Samjhauta Express- which runs between India and Pakistan- are another addition to the series of terrorism-related attacks which India has been facing since decades. This train was headed towards Pakistan and the blasts killed atleast 66 people , majority of them being Pak nationals.

This incidence is kind of unusual in that Pakistani nationals have been the victims on Indian soil and the incidence comes on the heels of Pak Foreign Minister Kasoori’s visit to india.
Click the BBC link to read more about this.

Whereas both nations’ media have tried to diffuse the situation by maintaining that this savage act of terrosrism is intended to derail the peace process and is in no one’s interest, there have been blame games also on both sides: Pak blaming Hindu organizations for this attack, while Indian side blaming Jehadi outfits for this! More will be out in days to come as the events unfold.
No one is the winner, of course. But India is a big loser! In this train, there were approximately 783 passengers and almost 75 % of them were Pak nationals. The rationale behind continuation of bus and train links is beyond my comprehension. Neither India is dependent on Pakistan for economic development,nor India needs Pakistan for any other urgent issues. When two neighbors donot go along, what is the best way out: chill out! Why are we dealing with Pakistan and for what! We cannot change geography, but we can try to maintain peace by not inter-acting with each other because there is great lack of mutual trust on both sides. India is the biggest victim of terrorism and particularly Pak-sponsored terrorism as our Indian media and government agencies make us believe. Then why are we dealing with this state which has no democracy and is a ‘rogue’ state in all likelihood! What are we reaping? I state that public or common people on both sides have mutual respect and good-will for one another,but that does not solve the issues related to security and governance.

The latest mechanisms (being worked out by both countries) to jointly fight terrorism may
win us cheers from Western media,but look ludicrous when we realize the ground realities. The cross-border terrorism by Pakistan and its often changing contours on Kashmir are enough evidences that these talk will lead us no where!

If we chill out in our relation with Pakistan, deal firmly to secure our borders ( as China did with us in last 4 decades): there will be more peace and less animosity in long term! Whereas on international screen, Pakistan’s involvement in propelling jehadi terrorism is increasingly becoming established, our misplaced zeal to bring more harmony with our relations with Pakistan will be a diplomatic defeat in years to come.

Stop playing cricket with Pakistan, donot deal with this state until democracy is established ( the typical USA ‘mantra’ while measuring countries on their foreign policy scale!), deal with your borders firmly (give Kashmir in the free hands of military and let it wipe out terrorism)! As far as people -to -people contact is concerned, there are enough messangers now on neutral grounds to build up the goodwill- if we have any in our hearts! Neutral grounds? Yes, donot Pakis and Indians meet daily on Devon street like Chicago where business goes as usual! And we have many such avenues in the world now that NRI and NRP (Non-Resident Pakistani: I am not sure whether such a phrase exists!) communities are growing! Letus see what they can generate for the two nations!

Types of Love: Philos Love

Feb 8: while I was driving back to home from my work (after a hectic night call while caring for neonates), I happened to listen to Christopher Phillips on Brian Lehrer show at NPR (National Public Radio, New York). Christopher is considered what we call “public philosophers” (for details visit http://www.philosopher.org). His ‘Socrates Cafe’ is a way of going to public and generating ‘democratic communities of philospohical inquiries’.

He describes 5 types of love:
1. Eros Love (erotic love) 2. Philos Love 3. Family love 4. Agape love (unconditional love) 5. Xaneo Love ( I hope I heard the right word!): love for strangers.

Coming to Philos love which means ‘friendship love’. Love for country is also included under this category. Now in today’s world- which is fast loosing its boundaries in the era of electronic communication- there are also increasing polarizations! Taken in that context, love for country has two sub-sets: a] Compassionate love: where the citizen is cognizant of the fact that his/her actions (and thus the country’s) will impact the world outside! b] Xenophobic patriotism: “we are the best and other (countries) are hostile to us” kind of attitude! This is of course not a desirable kind of love!
Love for country is also manifested in many way. Do not think that our rabble rouser politicians who cry hoarse on public platforms are the only people who love the country! Many people love their motherland yet may feel kind of uncomfortable feeling passionate about it (so called silent lovers!).

Christopher says that xaneo love is little understood and often less talked! This means love for strangers (xenophobia is hate for people/strangers). Do not we many times feel compassionate about someone whom we do not know much and have met him/her very little! Christopher cites an example of a family in a border town in Arizona (which borders Mexico). This family- who have a big farm- have a tradition of having an extra plate at dinner table for a stranger. It has so happened with them that they have often been visited by strangers who having crossed into their country from Mexico have knocked at their doors in desperate times!

This reminds me of a story which I have read in Hindi literature. In a village ,there used to live an old couple who were very poor. But their doors were always open for the people! Once in a night time, a stranger knocks at their door and asks if he could stay at their home overnight as he had lost his way and could not reach the destination in time. The poor man welcomes him, but is perplexed as to how to serve his guest because the food which they had prepared for the dinner was hardly sufficient for two. The couple serve the food to his his guest first and go to bed without eating!
In the morning when this guest leaves, he offers them a small utensil as a gift. It so happens that the old lady cooks the food in this utensil later on and so discovers that as soon as she empties the container it fills up again! Thus they realize that God himself had visited their home the previous night and had awarded this gift to them!

Exhibition on Aurangzeb in India

Francois Gautier’s organization is holding an exhibition on Aurangzeb in New Delhi (at India Habitat Center) from Feb 16 to 20, 2007. Here is the link to the news-article.

We have Auranzeb road in New Delhi, we have Aurangabad (the real name was Sambhaji Nagar) in Maharastra! What makes us persist with the signposts of an empire (Moghul empire) which was a dark period in the Indian history? Just our defeated mentality or we donot even care? The problem is that when we talk of such issues, the people tend to get polarized along their faith lines. The historical facts are important to us, our culture, our heritage and will shape our future. Thus a critical analysis should be done with a sense of rationality.

Shariat Bill passed in J&K Assembly

Jammu & Kashmir Assembly has passed the shariat bill. This news has really got unnoticed in the media or has it not cared about it? What are the implications? While there is an increasing need to implement a uniform civil code for all the citizens and scrap religion-bsed personal laws, what are the fallouts of these legislations? It is ironic that in a secular country, people are treated by the judiciary based upon their religion! What kind of secular state are we,then? In USA, for example, polygamy is il-legal for everyone, but in our country polygamy may be il-legal for one citizen,but may be entirely legal for another citizen.

Here is the link to the full article.