Building an Ugly India

India is on the move. Meet anyone -more so someone who has returned from India- and ask him/her: “So India is progressing well?” “Oh,yeah! for sure. Wherever you go, you see new roads, bridges being constructed. The face of India is changing and it is changing very fast. New buildings are coming up. And they add: If you want to see a true revolution of mobile telephony, India ia an apt example.”

However, what kind of India is coming up? Confused and zig-zag! What are we building up: cities of slums! Villages are shrinking up and being replaced by messy sub-divisions (tehsils). We have absolutely no control over our civic planning: things are just popping up haphazardly. And lesser we talk about pollution, the better it is! It is not that we cannot plan or envisage: we have brilliant minds in the concerned fields to take care of the things. But who cares! The mafia of builders and greedy politicians will like to put everything on sale to fill their coffers! It is so pathetic to see that Delhi which is so badly congested continues to expand with the help of its satellite towns: Faridabad, Gurgaon, NOIDA, and many more (see a link below about Gurgaon). Such is the expediency that from Presidential house (Rastrapati Bhavan) to needle-manufacturing units and pollution-emitting industrial units: everything seems to be hinging on Delhi or around. Everyting and everyone seems to be rushing towards Delhi! The situation of Mumbai and Kolkatta seems to be more horrific!

In this brilliant article “Building an Ugly India”, Gautam Bhatia- who is an architect- speaks out his inner pain the way we continue to build an ugly India.
Click on the link to read this article. Solution: He concludes by asking:”Or is it too late?”
http://www.india-seminar.com/2001/501/501%20gautam%20bhatia.htm

Link about Gurgaon: A concerned citizen writes in The Tribune (Feb, 07):

Pangs of growth

Gurgaon town is growing by leaps and bounds. Presently, it consists of 56 sectors. The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) has planned 51 additional sectors by 2021 in the Master Plan touching IMT Manesar.

Then comes the realm of Special Economic Zones — 600 acres by Orient Craft, 10,000 acres by HSIDC, 25,000 acres by Reliance Industries Limited, 20,000 acres by DLF and 5,000 acres by Raheza Group. Many more players may join the bandwagon by 2021. HUDA is also planning the expansion of Dharuhera complex from the other end. By 2021, Gurgaon town would become a monstrous city of 400 sectors!

With the existing drainage system, Gurgaon cannot bear even a single 50 mm rainfall of two hours. Environmental and ecological problems will further compound the sustainable issues. Will the Haryana government and NCR authorities realise the gravity of the situation and apply a mid-course correction expeditiously?

RAM NIWAS MALIK, Engineer-in-Chief (retd),Panckhula

Religion: An Atheist’s Point of view

Sam Harris says: “Religion gives good people bad reasons to be good.” What the heck! Well, if you read this interview, you will more than agree with his point of view.
His latest book “Letter to A Christian Nation” has sold very well.
Even though he is an atheist, he finds Jainism very interesting! He seems to be considering Gandhi more of a pacifist. He wonders how come a person like Mother Teresa who is serving the destitude and fighting for poor could abhor abortion ( an example of ‘moral intuitions clouded by religion’ as he terms)!
To read his views, click on the title above.

OSD

Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD) is one of the most common causes of knee pain in the adolescent. In the US, exact incidence is not known, but it is quite common.
Consisting of pain and edema of the tibial tubercle (and hence this is an extra-articular disease), OS disease is generally a benign, self-limited knee condition associated with ‘traction apophysitis’ in adolescent boys and girls.

Verbatim

Verbatim I

1. From ” MY Experiments with Truth”:

1] “But all my life through, the very insistence on truth has taught me to appreciate the beauty of compromise. I saw in later life that this spirit was an essential part of Satyagraha. It has often meant endangering my life and incurring the displeasure of friends. But truth is hard as adamant and tender as a blossom”.

2] In S Africa:”I had learnt at the outset not to carry any public work with borrowed money. One could rely on people’s promises in most matters except in respect of money. I had never found people quick to pay the amounts thy had undertaken to subscribe, and the Natal Indians were no exception to that. As, therefore, no work was done unless there were funds on hand, the natal Indian Congress has never been in debt.”

3] “But collecting funds was not the only thing to do. Infact, I had long learnt the principle of never having more money at one’s disposal than necessary.”

4] “Peole never cared to have receipts for the amounts they paid, but we always insisted on the receipts being given (ref. Natal Congress). Every pie was thus clearly accounted for… “

5] My experience has shown me that we win justice quicker by rendering justice to other party.

6] “That is why Sir William Hunter has called the indenture sytem (of labor) almost as bad as slavery. Like the slave, the indentured labourer was the property of his master “(ref. indentured labor sent from India to South Africa).

7] In S Africa, a white barber refused to do hair-cut on Gandhiji, when the latter went to his shop. In this reference, Gandhiji says: “We donot allow our barbers (in India) to serve our untouchable brethern. I got the reward of this in South Africa,not once, but many times, and the conviction that it was the punishment for our own sins saved me from becoming angry.”

8] When Gandhiji became famous in S Africa in Indian community for winning rights for them , he also pressed for social reforms, like sanitary reforms. In this regard, he says:

“But I had some bitter experiences. I saw that I could not so easily count on the help of the community in getting to do its own duty, as I could in claiming for its rights. At some places I met with insults, at other with polite indifference. It was too much for people to bestir themselves to keep their surroundings clean. To expect them to find money for the work was out of question. These experiences taught me ,better than ever before, that without infinite patience, it was impossible to get the people to do any work. It is the reformer who is anxious for the reform, not the society, from which he should expect nothing better than opposition, abhorrence and even moral persecution.”

9. While returning to S Africa after his one visit to India, he says: “I believed then that enterprising youths who could not find an opening in the country should emigrate to other lands. I therefroe, took with me four or five such youths, one of whom was Maganlal Gandhi.”

10] While reading Geeta: “Words like aparigraha (non-possession) and samabhava (equability) gripped me. How to cultivate and preserve that equability was the question.”

11] “A satyagrahi is born to be deceived. Let the commanding officer deceive us. Have I not told you times without number that ultimately a deceiver only deceives himself” (ref: to Sorabji in England).

12] To Rustam Kaka in S Africa, when he came to Gandhiji to save him from sure prisonment while admitting that he used to smuggle from India. Gandhji wanted him to admit guilt in front of authorities. He said: “I am of the opinion that the shame lies not so much in going to jail as in committing the offence. The deed of shame has already been done. Imprisonment you should regard as a penance. The real penance lies in resolving never to smuggle again”.

13. To a British secretary, Gandhhi argued: I have no doubt that the British government is a powerful government, but I have no doulbt also that satyagraha is a sovereign remedy.”

14. Gandhiji was interested to join Gokhale’s Friends of the Society (around 1916). There was much resistance in the meeting. He withdrew and says: The withdrawal of my appliaction made me truly a member of the Society.”

15] Many attempts were made to re-invest Gandhiji in S Africa as well as India in the sacred thread. He said: If shudras may not wear it, what right have the other varnas to do so? I had no objection to the thread as such, but the reason for wearing it were lacking”. He further argued to a swamiji: “So long as there were different religions, everyone of them may need some outward distinctive symbol. But when the symbol is made into a fetish and an instrument of proving the superiority of one’s religion over others’, it is fit only to be discarded. The sacred thread doesnot appear to me today to be a means of uplifting Hinduism. I am therefore indifferent to it.

16] “The Champaran struggle was a proof of the fact that disinterested service of the people in any sphere ultimately helps the country politically.”

17] In Kheda satyagraha (Gujrat), Gandhiji says: “The main thing was to rid the agriculturists of their fear by making them realize that the officials were not the masters but the servants of the people, inasmuch as they received their salaries from the taxpayer.” NB: How true is this dictum even today, infact much more relevant!

18. “Experience has taught me that civility is the most difficult part of satyagraha. Civilty here does not mean the mere outward gentlenessof speech cultivated for the occasion, but an inborn gentleness and desire to do the opponent good.”

19] “I had realized early enough in South Africa that there was no genuine friendship between the Hindus and Musalmans.”

20] While talking of Khilafat movement, he at one stage says:”……but it would be another matter and quite graceful , and reflect great credit on them, if the Musalmans of their own free will stopped cow- slaughter out of regard for the religious sentiments of the Hindus, and from a sense of duty towards them as neighbors and children of the same soil.

21] Post Jaliawalan massacre, Congress decided to bulid a memorial and thus raised one lakh rupess for that and as per Gandhiji ” the memorial trust has at present a handsome credit balance in the bank”. But as Gandhiji writes: “But the problem that faces the country today is what kind of memorial to erect on the ground, to sanctify which, Hindus, Musalmasn and Sikhs mingled their blood. The three communities, instead of being bound in a bond of amity and love, are to all appearance, at war with one another, and the nation is at a loss to how to utilize the memorial fund” .

2. There’s enough in the world for every man’s need, but not for every man’s greed.
– Mahatma Gandhi

3. Feeding a snake with milk increases its venom, no nectar is produced.
– Chanakya

4. “Peace is not just the absence of violence”. Peace comes from within. It is only when we have true peace of mind that we can look for peace externally. The main destroyer of peace of mind is not external but the internal enemies”- Dalai Lama

5. “The truth is, religion is mutually exclusive. The person who says, “Oh, I just believe them all,” is an idiot because the religions flat-out contradict each other. You cannot believe in reincarnation and heaven at the same time. “- Pastor Rick Warren, in Newsweek over a debate.

6. The means by which we live have outdistanced the ends for which we live. Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men.”
– Martin Luther King

Nehru and Shahid Bhagat singh

Nehru’s link with Bhagat Singh

I am grateful to Prof V.N Datta for having responded to my proposal on Bhagat Singh Chair at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), in the background of the martyr’s “close association” with Nehru (Perspective Page, Jan 14). As for his observations about Nehru’s conduct at Gandhi’s behest, I have no difference with him. Nehru backtracked from his friendship and closeness of ideas from Subhash Bose as well.
Though Jinnah defended Bhagat Singh in the Central Assembly during his and other revolutionaries’ hunger strike, other leaders also defended him, particularly Subhash Bose, who held a big rally in Delhi on March 20, 1931, three days prior to his execution, to oppose death sentence to Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev. Viceroy Lord Irwin wanted Gandhi to stop Subhash from holding this rally, but in vain.
Undoubtedly, Nehru and Bhagat Singh had deep liking for each other, particularly for socialist ideas. Bhagat Singh, in an article, had appreciated “Nehru’s ideas as more rational than those of Subhash Bose” though Subhash was emotionally more close to Bhagat Singh and other revolutionaries than Nehru was.

Prof CHAMAN LAL,
Centre of Indian LanguagesJNU, New Delhi

Published: The Tribune (Chandigarh), January 30,2007

Trivial facts


1. Which religion is atheistic, at least in its earliest form?
a] Hinduism b] Buddhism c] Christianity d] Islam
Answer is: Buddhism

2. American home now has more television sets than people….according to Nielson Media Research. There are 2.73 TV sets in the typical home and 2.55 people, the researchers said.” -from NY Times, Nov 22, 2006

Muslims of India are converts from Hindus

This study titled “A shared Y-chromosomal heritage between Muslims and Hindus in India” was published in November 2006 in the journal of ‘Human Genetics’. The study carried out at the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. If you click on the title, it will take you to the abstract of this research paper.

Basically, this study reinforces the long-held belief that Muslims in Indian sub-continent (present India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) are not the descendants of central asian Muslim invaders. We all know that Islam came to India centuries back through the Islamic invaders (like Babur- his original name being Zāhir ud-Dīn Mohammad- or more broadly called Mughal emperors). They came to the Hindu Indian sub-continent and gradually Islam spread: largely through forceful conversions ( Aurangzeb is the best known example in this regard) and to some extent by the voluntary conversion through the teachings of sufis. Also it is said that the majority of Hindus who converted were poor or so-called lower caste Hindus (this examlifies that caste system has been a bane for the Hindu society and has done so much damage to Hindus. Obviously!).

Thus the Muslims of Indian sub-continent are converted Hindus. Majority of them!
How religion can play havoc with the soul of a nation: India is a very apt example. How ironic that a nation was divided on the basis of religion! And more ironic is the fact that the two communities are the sons of the same mother. But now they fight in the name of religion. Fight for a religion which was always ALIEN to this country. How rueful ! The two brothers share the same blood, but fight because one eats beef, and for other cow is sacred! One considers that the nation is like a mother (Bharat maata), but other is willing to die rather than bow (vande maatram controversy)! For an “implanted” religion! They eat same,dress same, speak almost the same language(Urdu is an offshoot from Hindi), share many cultural values, but when rabble rousers arouse their passions, they will kill each other!

And the worse, the terrorism- more precisely Islamic terrorism- has done so much harm to this nation. On a global level, it will seem that only USA (they have immortalized 9/11 because they as a nation donot want to forget it and want to avenge the attack!) or Britain or some more countries have actually been a victim of Islamic terrorism, but India (Kashmir) has been bleeding since 1947! Similarly, christian conversions are in full force in North-East India and many other parts. Will USA come to our rescue? No. First we (India) have to stand up and face the terrorism and then others will come and pitch in.

Hindus typically donot believe in conversions/proselytization and I have never seen concerted efforts in this regard. Is it a bad idea that the Hindu saints make appeals and efforts to bring back (Shuddhi)those estranged brothers who had converted to the other faiths? This of course must be peaceful and entirely voluntary!
When I was growing up in India, I remember we Indians have a craze for the westernized names and many of christian names sound very ‘musical’to their ears (they are, actually. No denying.) But after spending many years abroad (USA), I witness that Indian christians-even though living in nations with predominantly Christian populations- have their own churches! What to talk of these recent immigrants (as my Indian christains are), churches for blacks and whites are also separate. This is the level of acceptance! Thus it pains me that some of Indians look Indians, eat Indian foods, come to Indian stores for groceries, donot go to ‘their’ churches (even though share the common faith) but when it comes to names, have names that sound not Indian, rather sound totally alien! Why an Indian who was born in a village or city in India, grew up studying and speaking Hindi or a equally sweat regional language (along with English), swears by Indian customs, ethos and cannot live without ‘desi’ food, speaks English with a typical Indian accent and yet has a name like David, Johnson, Robert, Anney, Marria, Aurangzeb, Asif or Qutub! How alien it sounds! Someone will ask me : what is in a name? Very true, but your name does show your ethnicity,identity and cultural back-ground and values! Do we expect a boy living in a city somewhere in Peru (Latin America) having a name like Suresh or Bhaskar or Anil! No, we donot! And it will be weired, if we do come across! Does not it seem strange that a person living in India should carry an Arabic, Persian or Turkish name ( no offence intended, these are beautiful languages) because he is a muslim! Are these names relevant to an Indian- who has all his life lived in India, and never even ventured out of his city and carries the burden of ‘alien’ names like Khan ( a lineal descendant of Genkhis Khan), Zia( light), Hussain (name of a saint), Allam ( very knowledgeable), Manssor (victorious), Azmal (holy), Shakeel (beautiful), Anjum (star), Afroza , Ruksana. Similarly names like David, Phillips, Paul, Michael, Elizabeth, Nicolas, Peter, Sussan, Alexandra have some connotations to the Bible or the places but as far as Indian land is concerned, they are totally ‘foreign’, ‘alien’ and strange -looking names. That day, I met a person from Turkey whose 4 years daughter’s name was ‘Noorjahan”. Very apt and relevant name , I thought! But what the heck, why we Indians have been carrying the burden of such words since ages whom we donot even understand ! Agreed, India has been a land of assimilation, religious tolerance but whom are we aping? And why in the name of maintaining a separate identity, Muslims of my country -who are Indians in every respect- are carrying these alien language names!

Dear brothers and sisters! Dear countrymen!Come out of this paradox! Shun what was never yours! We are not the descendants of Babur and Aurangzeb! Come back and embrace your true roots of the oldest civilization -which belongs to you and you belong to it! And the one which spreads universal peace and brotherhood. Come back and letus bring back our glorious heritage: one based upon the universal concepts of peace, brotherhood and compassion. Come back to your original faith and be an Indian with a global vision (Vasudhaive Kutumbakam)and for world peace ( Vishwa Shanti).
This will be the first step to get back your identity!

I donot envisage a Hindu nation, beacuse I am of the resolute opinion that fathers of our Constitution showed greater vision in declaring India a ‘Secular’ state. And India has always been a secular nation. But regaining of our lost faith should be seen as a consolidation of our strength! And this will go a long way in furthering the cause of a truly secular society based upon uniform civil codes for all the citizens.

Is China Collapsing?

Everyone is talking about China these days. It is the rising star and western media is devoting countless time and energy in analyzing how and why China is going to be the number one economy in the years to come.
Here is another point of view. Infact, the author Gordon Chang ( http://www.gordonchang.com/) had predicted in his book ‘The Coming Collapse of China’ in 2003 that China will not be able to sustain this tempo.
The author is a Chinese American lawyer who has lived and worked in China and Hong Kong for over 20 years, bringing first-hand experience and economic expertise to this book.

Think Tanks

Washington, DC -based “The Heritage Foundation” strives to build an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity and civil society flourish. Its mission statement reads: “Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institute – a think tank – whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.”
The Foundation claims it has influenced many policies and decisions in American history and polity and continues to do so. As it says: “We believe that ideas have consequences, but that those ideas must be promoted aggressively. So, we constantly try innovative ways to market our ideas.”
To read more about the foundation and its activities, logon to:http://www.heritage.org/

So we are talking of think tanks. Wikipedia says: “Since “think tank” is a term that has only found use since the 1950s, there is still some debate over what constitutes the first think tank. One candidate is the Fabian Society of Britain, founded in 1884 to promote gradual social change. The Brookings Institution, founded in the US in 1916 is another candidate for the first think tank. The term think tank itself, however, was originally used in reference to organizations that offered military advice, most notably the RAND Corporation, formed originally in 1945.
Until around 1970, there were no more than several dozen think tanks, mostly focused on offering non-partisan policy and military advice to the United States government, and generally with large staffs and research budgets. After 1970, the number of think tanks exploded, as many smaller new think tanks were formed to express various partisan, political, and ideological views.”